Texas rules barring some sex offenders from using certain websites were thrown into jeopardy Monday morning after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a similar statute in North Carolina violates the First Amendment. Full Article
Related posts
-
TX: Texas Cops Fired for ‘Inappropriate’ Sexual Contact With Massage Workers
Source: reason.com 11/13/24 As a result of the internal affairs investigation, three Lewisville officers were fired,... -
TX: The ‘Lights Out’ program makes trick-or-treating safer by rounding up sex offenders
Source: msn.com/KTXS Halloween is rapidly approaching and a top priority for parents is keeping their children... -
TX: Texas Sues Pornhub for Failing to Check IDs
Source: news.yahoo.com 2/28/24 The first age verification lawsuit against a major web porn purveyor is here....
This doesn’t affect anything in Texas.
Probation and Parole can restrict anything they want to within reason.
I’ve got this restriction during probation. Anyone is free to challenge it as not related to their crime, but most don’t care enough to pay a lawyer to do that. Restrictions on parole or probation aren’t supposed to be mandatory to all that committed specific crimes and are supposed to be tailored to the individual but that hardly ever happens and it’s hard to afford an attorney to challenge it. The Packingham case doesn’t change any of this one way or the other.
What’s the Texas address? I’ll send them a dollar to wipe their tears.
“…registered sex offenders disproportionately commit additional sex crimes online…”
What the EFF??????? Where do these stupid morons come up with this crap????